The article “Complementary and Alternative Medicine in US Family Medicine Practices: a Pilot Qualitative Study” is a credible source because it passes the seven questions test examining relevance, evidence, author, publisher, timeliness, comprehensiveness, and genre. It is an account of an experiment in which four family medicine practices are observed “To identify some of the concepts and challenges shaping family medicine practices that incorporate CAM [(complementary and alternative medicine)]” (Hamilton et al).
Essay due? We'll write it for you!
The article is relevant to my purpose of showing how alternative medicine is affecting modern-day medicine, and my audience is people considering CAM (complementary and alternative medicine). The article mentions that doctors that offer CAM generally spend more time with patients, which leads to more knowledge about the patients, and a wider range of treatment options the patient is able to choose from. “In the United States, the average length of a generalist office visit is 16 to 19 minutes.7,8 Visits to CAM practitioners often are much longer than this” (Hamilton et al). “Dr. Dl adds that these longer sessions allow her to provide better care, “because [other physicians] don’t have the time. They may know [the same facts], but they are not going to sit down and take the time I just took” to provide “a more individualized approach”(Hamilton et al).
Enough evidence is offered to support the authors’ analyzation of the data. They include a table laying out all the relevant evidence gathered over the course of the experiment.
The publisher, InnoVision Health Media, Inc., did not affect the article with bias. According to the “about us” section of their website, it is a scholarly journal that publishes professional and consumer magazines, journals, websites, and newsletters.
The authors are very knowledgeable about the subject and use information from references to support their conclusion. They are doctors and educators in the field related to the article. The authors’ affiliations are as follows: Jennifer L. Hamilton, MD, PhD, is an assistant professor in the Department of Family, Community, and Preventive Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Beatrix Roemheld-Hamm, MD, PhD, is an associate professor and director of the integrative medicine program at the Department of Family Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ)-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Barbara DiCicco-Bloom, RN, PhD, is an assistant professor and the director of the Health Resources and Services Administration-funded National Health Service Research Fellowship in the Department of Family Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. Doctors Hamilton and Roemheld-Hamm, Denise M. Young, MD, MPH, and Mihai Jalba, MD, PhD, were fellows in the Health Service Research Fellowship at UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School when the described research was conducted.
The paper is written in the style of a scientific experiment that follows the scientific process, including: context, objective, design, methods, setting, results, and conclusion, The authors are very specific and identify their method and how it works: “To explore unfamiliar practice settings, we used a multi-method technique including participant observation, key informant interviews, semi-structured depth interviews of providers and staff members, and observation of patient-provider encounters. This approach is a variation of the multi-method assessment process (MAP) used in several studies of primary care” (Hamilton et al).
I didn’t see any bias in the paper. It is in a professional tone without negative or positive emotions conveyed that would point to a bias.
The article was published May/June of 2008 and was last updated 3/19/14. It is a fairly recent article being less than 7 years old, and had a recent update just last year. It is always important for anything medically related to be recent because the field is one of the fastest-evolving fields.
The article is quite comprehensive. It lays out the information from start to finish leaving out no important details. It has a table that summarizes the data gained from the family practices.
The article has an informative style without personal views or assumptions clouding the information or meaning. It instead is just the description of an experiment, the data, and how the authors analyzed the data.
Overall, the article is credible. It meets the criteria in the seven evaluation tools mentioned in our textbook. It focuses on information about family practices and alternative medicine, both of which pertain to my purpose of showing how alternative medicine is affecting modern-day medicine.
Disclaimer: This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. You can order our professional work here.
Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.
Your essay sample has been sent.
Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.Order now