Please note! This essay has been submitted by a student.
After reading both articles, I hope that my analysis would assist you in selecting the better article to dispatch to the heads of the different departments. The main topic identified in both articles is the gender discrimination faced by women bosses. After comparing the credibility of the claims, tone and the background of the authors, I feel that the article written by Wolfe is more reliable and persuasive. Shiao’s claims were unsubstantial while Wolfe’s claims were well founded. Both authors mentioned personality traits in their article. Shiao implied women tend to have feminine traits and thus should not assume the stereotypical role of male leaders while Wolfe attributed such traits to women being better bosses. Shiao claimed that we have an issue with ambition in women because we see it as conflicting with the norm of what women ought to resemble. However, this statement was drawn on her personal speculation and not based on facts and no evidence was used to support her point. On the contrary, Wolfe mentioned women who were positioned higher than men attributed it to their stereotypical feminine traits such as being more nurturing. In this case, her argument was well supported with examples where she proved that traits in women made them better leaders compared to men. To prove that Wolfe’s evidence was indeed reliable, I did some research and discovered that a leader should possess both masculine and feminine traits so that employees would be more satisfied with them. For example, women tend to be more sensitive than men. Thus, translating this skill into understanding and listening to the concerns and opinions of the employees would make them better bosses. Therefore, comparing the claims between the two articles, Shiao’s statement lacked evidence to support her point, making her claim unsubstantial while Wolfe’s claims were well supported with evidence and were also backed by my personal research, making it a rather reliable claim. Based on the credibility of the claims, Wolfe’s article is more persuasive.
Comparing the tone in both articles, Shiao’s tone was biased while Wolfe’s tone was impartial. In Shiao’s article, she unfolded with “There is just something about a strong, assertive female boss that somehow gets under people’s skin.” This sentence evidently expresses personal preference towards the topic and it is likely that such views would be carried in the rest of her article. Shiao uses assertive phrases like “Admit it”, “I concur on this point”, “you are so wrong” revealing her single-minded pursuit in supporting gender discrimination faced by women bosses. However, Wolfe introduced her article with a fact, intending to create a balanced opinion towards this topic. This can be seen through her extensive use of research and evidence that backed her claim. For example, she asked, “Do Men Make Better Bosses Than Women?”, unlike Shiao, she did not convey her stand immediately but instead listed facts and evidence implying a conclusion thought out, yet open to dispute. This shows that Wolfe was unbiased towards the topic as she held an objective view towards it. According to April Klazema, copywriting and inbound content marketing expert, subjectivity can be incorrect and unconvincing, while objectivity suggests being as accurate as possible. Thus, in terms of the tones displayed in both articles, Wolfe’s tone was impartial, making the article more convincing as there were objective views incorporated compared to Shiao’s.
Lastly, looking at the background of the authors, Shiao is a current journalist at The Business Times while Wolfe is a former writer who wrote about women in business for more than eight years. The nature of journalism weaves personal beliefs and motivation when writing and this can be seen in Shiao’s article. Jay Rosen, a media critic and journalism professor at New York University mentioned, “There is no act of journalism that is not saturated with judgment.” Hence as a journalist, it is likely for Shiao to incorporate her personal beliefs into the article making it opinionated. On the other hand, Wolfe’s years of experience in women in business proves that she specializes in the topic and it is likely that her article would be thorough in the aspects of authenticity and transparency. Her conclusions would be based on professional and meticulous judgments rather than personal opinions. Thus, in terms of the background of the authors, Wolfe’s article is more persuasive due to her specialized knowledge of the topic.
In conclusion, I would suggest Wolfe’s article as the best one to be sent out as it is more reliable and persuasive in the aspects of the credibility of the claims, tone and the background of the authors.