Analysis of "Watchmen" by Alan Moore


Please note! This essay has been submitted by a student.

Download PDF

In 1986, Alan Moore’s progressive realistic novel, Watchmen, re-imagined the superhuman type and pushed the limits of what is viewed as extraordinary writing. At the focal point of its plot sits the exemplary gallant idea of more significant benefit, the forfeit of the few for the many. Set in a substitute adaptation of the 1980s, Watchmen takes after a few saints as they reveal their confidant Ozymandias’ arrangement to join the world by relinquishing a huge number of blameless lives and pointing the finger at it on a phony outsider intrusion. Be that as it may, when they find his plot, it has just been done and he can persuade everything except one of them, Rorschach, not to uncover reality to the world.

Essay due? We'll write it for you!

Any subject

Min. 3-hour delivery

Pay if satisfied

Get your price

All through its story, Watchmen presents a few goes up against the ethical quality of murder, a definitive judgment of death, and its suggestions in the terrific plan of the world. Nonetheless, no decision is passed on the world’s destiny. The villain who is seen to be Ozymandias, is seen more like a hero at the beginning of the story for a variety of reasons. The clothes he wears are bright and colorful, his initial behaviors in the story do not seem to be negative, and he seems to get along with the other characters.

Usually the villain in the story has a reason for acting out on society in such negative ways. This idea is very commonly seen in fairy tales or children’s movies and books. For example, in snow white, the evil queen (aka. The villain), did the things she did because of her passionate jealousy towards snow white for being the “fairest in the land). Or in the story “Sleeping Beauty”, maleficent, the villain, has a deep anger throughout the entire film and in the newly-masde movie called, “Maleficent”, it digs deeper into her reasons for being so cold. Her reasons were also from jealousy and hatred towards someone who has wronged them in the past. However, in this story, Ozymandias wants to save the world but by doing so, he feels the need to kill off the population. So, he doesn’t have intentions to sabotage anyone for any reason, he just thinks that his method is the only way to save the world.

Along with his intentions, Ozymandias also shows to be a villain in the way he talks. The way he says things can be interpreted negatively. Here, he says, “”My name is Ozymandias, king of kings: Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair”. There is a great deal of self-importance in this announcement, and it’s nearly as though he were stating that his name signifies “lord of rulers.” He boasts about his “works” (statues like the one depicted, pyramids, and so forth.) too, telling the “Strong” to “lose hope” in light of the fact that their works will never be as great or as his. Incidentally, Ozymandias’ works are no place to be seen – all that is left is a fruitless desert and this broken statue. His pride is made to look dumb in light of the fact that his “works” are altogether gone, aside from this divided statue that, truly, is at the end of its usefulness.

writers online
to help you with essay
banner clock
Clock is ticking and inspiration doesn't come?
We`ll do boring work for you. No plagiarism guarantee. Deadline from 3 hours.

We use cookies to offer you the best experience. By continuing, we’ll assume you agree with our Cookies policy.