Please note! This essay has been submitted by a student.
Since its e-book in 1951, The Catcher In The Rye, written via manner of J.D. Salinger has served as a conflagration for debate and excessive controversy. Although the novel has been the goal of scornful grievance, it has additionally been the subject of full-size dialogue. The novel portrays the existence of 16 12 months antique, Holden Caufield. Currently, in psychiatric care, Holden remembers what took place to him remaining Christmas. At the beginning of his tale, Holden is a pupil at Pencey Prep School. Having been expelled for failing 4 out of his 5 training, Holden leaves college and spends seventy two-hours in New York City earlier than returning home. There, Holden encounters new thoughts, humans, and stories. Holden’s mental struggle inside himself serves due to the fact the device that uncovers the approaching-of-age novel’s underlying subject matters of teen angst, despair, and the disingenuous nature of society. The novel tackles issues of blatant profanity, teenage intercourse, and distinct erratic behavior. Such troubles have supplemented the controversial nature of the ebook and in flip, have sparked the question of whether or now or not this ebook should be banned. The novel, The Catcher In the Rye, needs to no longer be banned from inclusion inside the literature courses taught at the immoderate college diploma.
Banning a book on the idea of profanity is simply not a very good idea because of the purpose of those who want to restrict ideals that don’t meet what they think. By a novel from a high college curriculum on the way to help students from profanity, is an try to do the now not possible. Profanity is observed anywhere. According to the TV Guide, ‘Profanity is uttered as soon as every six mins on American primetime tv,’ (TV). Students can’t get away used to profanity. Students pay interest profanities on television, on radio, study them in magazines, and a majority use profanities themselves in casual communication. Students additionally pay attention to profanities in countless movies.
‘Holden Caufield, the main character, swears step by step throughout the e-book. His curses are of the tamest type, though, ‘damn’, ‘hell’, ‘crap’, ‘ass’, and he curses so self-consciously and so continuously that the words lose a maximum of their vulgarity. Most of the cursing in the ebook might no longer additionally be rated PG-13 if it had been in a film,’ (Chandler).
The profanity used at some point of the radical is at the identical degree to the profanity regularly heard in a PG-13 rated movie. A PG-13 film is supposed to audiences a long time thirteen and older. In an average high faculty, the pupil frame is over the age of thirteen. Therefore, since the profanity in The Catcher In the Rye is on the quantity appropriate for young adults 13 and older, the usage of profanity as the concept of censorship and scrutiny isn’t relevant. Profanity isn’t always a legitimate ground to restrict nor censor literature.
Banning books which consist of, The Catcher In The Rye breaks the freedoms that America became based upon. The Bill of Rights is one of the founding requirements upon which America changed into established. The First Amendment states, ‘Congress shall make no regulation respecting a reputation quo of religion, or prohibiting the loose exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech or the clicking.’ (U.S. Constitution). Banning books honestly contradicts the First Amendment. To ban an ebook is to restrict the workout of unfastened speech, as a result, denying people their proper to put into effect their First Amendment rights. Banning books is unconstitutional. Not best do First Amendment rights follow to adults but they apply to all United States citizens, which includes young adults. According to The Library Bill of Rights, ‘Freedom of expression is an inalienable right and the inspiration for self-authorities. Freedom of expression encompasses the freedom of speech and the corollary proper to get hold of facts. These rights make bigger to minors similarly to adults . . . Rights of customers who are minors shall in no way be abridged,’ (Fricke). Freedom of expression isn’t always restricted to adults, minors too, have the proper to freely express themselves and get hold of information. Therefore, minors have the right to study any substances which they desire. By banning The Catcher In The Rye, and novels of the like, the rights of U.S. Citizens are constrained.
The novel, The Catcher In The Rye should not be banned. Banning this novel contradicts a person’s rights as a United States citizen. It limits freedom of speech and into different forms of expression. Although controversial, profanity isn’t a motive to restrict an individual’s rights. America is based on ideas that aren’t fueled by way of exceptions. Profanity isn’t an exception to freedom of speech. The Catcher in the Rye should no longer be excluded from schools.