Previous research has shown that gender-based stereotypes had influenced and gave an impact towards juror perceptions of criminal defendants by recording their verdict and evaluation of the case (Strub & Masser, 2015). Within the case, the gender of the participants and witness was manipulated and…
Court Essay Examples and Topics
Essay Examples
Essay Topics
Most of the western country’s population don’t often know about the punishments used around the world and in most cases just assume that punishments and sentences are the same or similar given out in their states, but that can’t be further from the truth. Occasionally,…
There is a fine line between what should be tolerated and what should be banned.The common occurrence in our world is child abuse. Yes Corporal Punishment can be used as a last option for bad behavior for your child but many parents in the U.S…
Generally, witnesses in court are compellable to answer questions that are put forward to them. However, the privilege from self-incrimination is the exception to this rule, meaning that suspects are not legally required to answer questions put towards them or give evidence. Countries such as…
I understand Contract law to be an ever evolving body of law that has roots dating back to the medieval period, with the Lex Mercatoria, involving a few European merchants to today where multi-million dollar business contracts are set out in many forms; where the…
In February, specifically on the 14th of February, I had the opportunity and privilege to observe a civil case. This case took place in Newark, NJ, at the Superior Court. The judge presiding over this case was Judge Jose L. Linares. Liger6, LLC v. Antonio…
The Plessy v. Ferguson case wrongfully convicted Plessy telling him that the 14th amendment only applied to political rights not “social rights”. Homer Plessy was a 7/8ths white and a 1/8th black man living in a white and black world, with no in between. Whites…
In the United States Supreme Court cases of Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. the Board of Education, the Court show signs that they are in favor of segregation. By assessing documents from the perspective of individuals in the different departments like psychology, sociology, etc.,…
A thirty-year-old shoemaker makes a history-altering decision on Tuesday, June 7, 1892, when he will be purchasing a train ticket to board the East Louisiana Local to purposely sit in the whites-only section. The man of the hour is Homer Plessy, and although he was…
The certainty of Miranda v. Arizona is a known as the important legitimate contention, simply because at the finish of Miranda vs. Arizona it prompted the presence of something huge that is still even practiced till this day. The case of Miranda v. Arizona occurred…
No man is allowed to be tortured to attract a confession out of him; he must be convicted first by trial. Then if it is clear that he had conspirators he is allowed to be “tortured” but in a humane manner. The Connecticut Law in…
Everyone has their natural right when they are being arrested or enterrigated they must be informed of their rights so that they understand that everything they say can and will be used against them later. Arnesto Miranda was the man in the case that wasn’t…
From something as simple as stealing candy to something as insane as murder, children all over the world throughout the years have committed crimes. In most states, if a child is younger than the age of ten years old they are automatically deemed incapable of…
Introduction Many people would agree that the world we live in today is not the best place. For three innocent men, this statement is nothing but the truth. These men are known as Dred Scott, Emmett Till, and Trayvon Martin. Although they may have been…
Child custody evaluations are provided when there are disputes over decision making, caretaking and access to a child in the wake of marital or other relationship dissolution. When conducting these evaluations, psychologists are expected to focus on factors that pertain specifically to the psychological best…
Child Custody is one of the most troubling and exhausting issues that parents can face. When two people file for a divorce, it not only breaks apart the relationship between two people but it also tears up the entire family which includes the kids and…
Strict courts are segregating ladies with regards to youngster authority, and this is adversely affecting the kid. A recommended arrangement accompanies applying a common law that guarantees the youngster’s wellbeing alongside a story of accord between the guardians. First, we will examine how the Lebanese…
This is where the court applies and relates to Legislation. Judges use four core moralities when inferring to statute: The literal Rule The golden Rule The Mischief Rule The Purposive approach. The Literal Rule The literal rule is the rule used to interpreting statutes. It…
Parties involved in the boda boda 2010 case are mainly two: Boda boda 2010 Association and Boda Riders Century Association. Before the arrest of boda boda 2010 fame Abdulla Kitatta on the 31st January of 2018. It is believed that they engaged in the killing…
On the 20th of January 2018, some of the leaders and members of Boda Boda 2010, including its patron Abdullah Kitatta were arrested by the military on suspicion that they participated in the kidnap and murder of Case Clinic accountant Francis Ekalungar who was murdered…
Negligence was added to common law in the 17th century by the increasing number of horse and buggy roads collisions. The beginning of the 17th century was marked by a slow but steady transformation from an unlawful action of trespass to a case of negligence….
The concept of medicine and medical practices was widespread in ancient India. India had a well-developed medical system called Ayurveda. Holy book Ramayana gives examples that illustrate the advances in surgical skills and medical treatments at the time. In ancient India, the system of medicine…
This case study is about an inquest which was heard in the Adelaide Magistrate court on 29th of August. An inquest is a court hearing that sees the state Coroner gather information regarding the cause and circumstance of death, and assist in making recommendations in…
Introduction Alternative dispute resolution mechanism refers to settlement of conflicts without referring the matter to the long and costly court processes. There are several ways of settling disputes that have greatly been embraced in Kenya. They include but are not limited to mediation, conciliation, arbitration,…
Judges, when poised to render sentencing, should not engage in fact-finding. New Jersey that the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial a constitutional protection[] of surpassing importance prohibits judges from enhancing criminal sentences beyond statutory maximums based on facts other than those decided by…
When he is faced with a trial which could cause him to lose his freedom and a promising future he decides to write on what’s happening, with the hope of turning it into a movie. His reason for doing so is to show how racial…
The advantage to a sensible starter and the advantage to possibility of clarification once in a while radiate an impression of being in fight. In various wards far and wide there have been different cases in which media openings have been restricted recollecting the genuine…
The Role of the Media in Law While it is a given that the media plays a large role in many large and small court cases, it can be argued whether this role is positive or negative. As journalism has become more relevant in the…
The U.S. Supreme Court made decisions in the past that shaped the American history. For example, the Supreme Court ended racial segregation and protected children by enforcing child labor laws. Given its importance in the country, the Supreme Court is discretionary hence it does not…
Comparison of the laws and Supreme Court of both the United Kingdom and the United Arab Emirate Introduction Law is a set of rules that are stipulated with a clear outline to govern and give directions in a given set up or country. Law is…
In the past every decade has endured an event that has marked history in some way or another. The 30 s marked The Great Depression. The 60 s showed the assassination of President Kennedy. And although the 90 s isn t quite over yet, one…
John Marshall: Early Decisions Influencing Today How can the basic principles of one man be guidelines in the Supreme Court’s major ruling decisions? John Marshall, a man with no formal college education, was Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Under his authority the Supreme Court…
Explain the jury selection process Every defendant has the right to an impartial jury that focuses on the evidence provided and the United States constitution in making a decision regarding a given case. The selection of the jury is the most important part in a…
This essay aims to discuss the tribunal system in terms of the advantages and disadvantages as opposed to the traditional court system. According to the Open University “tribunal is a term that has been used to refer to a number of different decision-making bodies”. Tribunals…
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen. The Court, unanimously allowing the appeal, has marked a judicial shift from…
The unique advantages from a choice of law perspective that English law brings within its scope are as follows Doctrine of judicial precedent Under English law, court judges in order to provide a judgment on a case are bounded by any a higher court previous…
Legitimate history is the record of past occasions that arrangement with the law. Lawful history is a train that reviews occasions of the past that relate to all aspects of the law. Examination of specific laws, lawful organizations, people who work in the lawful framework,…
Dred Scott V Sandford Court Case When the Supreme Court denied citizenship and freedom to Dred Scott, had this violated Scott’s right to equal citizenship rights and protection that was guaranteed, after a few years, under the 14th amendment? It’s quite a difficult decision to…
After studying and observing the process involved with false confession, the researchers found that it is hard to accept the false confession as a true evidence. This is because people admit to the crime for some other reasons. In some criminal cases, the best part…
A punishment is designed to express a community’s attitude of disapproval, resentment, and oftentimes outrage. Conviction can mean punishment. Punishment requires not as much as some penalty like imprisonment, but condemnation. A pardon does nothing more than wipe out a penalty, but not the condemnation….
The South African authorities’ efforts to interview the main characters accused of being implicated in the various state capture reports are not or should I say were never fair at all, because there are certain individuals who were also implicated but they were never exposed…
“Injustice anywhere is threat to justice everywhere” was stated by Martin Luther King. The core concept of criminal law is that “let a hundred guilty get scot free, but one innocent should not be convicted”. The person accused of crime is presumed to be innocent…
Introduction This topic is center of heated debates in the legal fraternity of Pakistan after recent move of Pakistani apex court to adjudicate on some complicated articles of constitution of Pakistan in its recent adjudications. The Judges of apex court were widely criticized of making…
Mediation, when used appropriately can reduce costs, opportunity costs and facilitate the maintaining of social relations, addressing some of the weaknesses of the adversarial civil court system. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques, especially mediation, can provide an avenue for civil disputes which is less cost-intensive…
In-Depth Case Analysis Many people around the United States, especially in the South, were outraged following the court’s decision in the case Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans to not allow the group to have a picture of the Confederate flag on their…
Judicial Restraint is a theory of judicial interpretation that encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power. It asserts that judges should hesitate to strike down laws unless they are obviously unconstitutional. Judicially-restrained judges respect stare-decisis, the principle of upholding established precedent handed…
Fortunately, with the modernization of courtrooms and technological advances, videoconferencing over the years has presented a higher quality, fully synchronized video and audio system. However, courtrooms need to familiarize themselves with the ever evolving technology and its use in a court setting. The fear of…
Courts are tasked to provide effective administration of justice in a qualitative fashion: the efficiency of justice lies in its ability to settle disputes within a reasonable time, at sensible costs. Videoconference testimonials are changing the practice of law, as is cyberjustice as a whole….
