Electronic devices in the classroom can be a source of distraction for oneself and for others, and they also can be used in a way that shows lack of respect. They can also be helpful as aids for learning because they make taking notes more efficient and makes access to information easier. Keeping these issues in mind, how could a professor teaching a 100 level ethics course, how would you incorporate technology in your classroom in an ethical way? Would you incorporate technology in the classroom in a way that uses most ethically? Support your decision and defend them against a possible challenge.
Integrating technology into a classroom means more than teaching basic computer skills in a seperate computer class. Effective ways of combining technology requires support and training for teachers to better absorb technology into teaching and learning for the students Mattison , Lindsay. “Ethical Issues with Using Technology in Classroom.” Study.com, Study.com, Jan. 2017, study.com/blog/ethical-issues-with-using-technology-in-the-classroom.html states that “Ethics has always been at it’s core of creating a thriving learning environment and that students are familiar through the principled examples, such as: these are the rules (dont push); here are reasons for the rules (dont cause harm to others)”. In the classroom, we are prone to the basic ethical behaviors such as loyalty, equality, trust and mutual respect which is just as important as technology ethics that are the same ethics like the ones I listed.
Since technology is so involved in the education spectrum, ethics corresponding to computer usage needs to be added and continually revisited as it may be a cluster with inappropriate, illegal and time-wasting programs. When technology is integrated in the classroom, students not only become engaged but also begin to take more control of their own learning. Effective use with technology changes the classroom dynamic and in a way can motivate students to do project-based learning with reliable technology resources. Incorporating technology in an ethical way has to do with the action, worth and practice that process the use in technology without damaging the moral values, beliefs of an individual. https://study.com/blog/ethical-issues-with-using-technology-in-the-classroom.html – Describe one of the three corners of the Ethical Theory Triangle and how it “frames” our ethical thinking. Summarize a stance about an ethical issue discussed in Chapter 1 and 2 of Michael J Sandel’s Justice that illustrates this ethical category. What does this theory stance reveal about the ethical issue, and what does it leave out? How can bringing in other “corners” from the triangle help us to understand the ethical issue differently?
In the book Justice by Michael J. Sandel, Sandel approaches that is what we’re really after. That’s one of the main things that Sandle talks about throughout his book. He approaches case three study’s: Attentional Price Gouging, the Awarding of Purple Hearts, and Awarding of Bounces of CEOs. In Attentional Price Gouging (pg 3), Sandel states the concerns potential price gouging the inflation of prices after a disaster (Hurricane Charley) people that need access to fuel and food and those who have it can charge a whole a lot more for typically charge because there are a very short supply people for really who need it. They defend doing do on grounds that by charging higher prices to incentivize suppliers to bring in more of those sorts of goods. Such that people who are able to purchase them will have access to more goods well of course is the argument against it is that it’s takes advantage of those who are in just a terrible situation argument that typical free market conditions no longer exists after as disaster and there’s no typical supply chain of different goods and so this is a form exploitation a form of taking unfair advantage of people who are in a very desperate situation. Sandel concludes that people who are charging these very high prices are bad people and bad character.
In the case of Awarding Purple Hearts (pg. 10) there was different reasons and arguments against the Awarding Purple Hearts to veterans that have suffered PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). The official reasons given by the US military included the fact that PTSD wasn’t an intentional result of an enemy attack but Sandell point out that it is the case that when soldiers year eardrums burst as a result of explosions that’s probably not an intended result of enemy attach they intend to complete disable and kill the soldiers not simply make them deaf or even temporarily deaf but that can’t be a good reason. But when he digs a little bit deeper he founds that it seems what the real objection behind awarding soldiers the purple heart for PTSD is that psychological trauma indicate on some level at least it is perceived to indicate weakness of course we can’t fault soldiers for having psychological trauma after having endure the terrible nature of battle of having to try to kill fellow human being of being a target for death of other human beings but this seems to be the background motivation behind denying psychological injuries that higher status.
Lastly, the case of Awarding Of Bounces Of CEOs (pg. 12) and companies that have received bailout funds companies that have remained afloat only because the US taxpayer has subsidized their accounts. There are receiving more money than they deserve because the Sandell points out many of them claimed that well we lost all that money just because we were caught up in the circumstances were caught up in the moment and it was a tsunami of bad decision and tsunami of bad conditions that just prevented them from making money and ensure that everyone would lose money but Sandell points that “if you’re a victim whenever we call on economic hard times you’re probably not a deserving benefactor when economic times are good” and so you got to take responsibility for one if you take responsibility for the other and so what he indicates is that what’s really wrong with paying the CEOs or what at the heart of objection is probably the fact that we don’t want to reward failure. Just lift they have lost in this money that’s not something want to reward especially with government thoughts.
Overall I believe this would be part of the Deontological corner of the Ethical Theory Triangle because in each case, Sandell is talking about how at least every person in every case has their duties and liberties right, while it should be also focusing on the principle in every aspect of the case. It should be focused more on the result and not the action. This can also relate to the Consequentialist corner of the Theory Triangle because in the Price Gouging Case, people are affected by the prices increasing after the Hurricane Charley. Since people are charging goods that are priced higher than usual, the actions is determined by its consequences. Therefore if people would still rise the prices, they have bad character. This doesn’t help the Virtue Ethics corner because in the three cases, there was no characteristics of a good person and a good life. –How teachers and students think about grades influences how they approach learning. What are some of the views concerning the purpose and value (both positive and negative) of grades?
On the whole what is the best view (ethically speaking) of what grades should do in order to improve learning? Take a stance and defend it against a possible challenge. The purpose of grading is the performance assessment. They serve as a tool to measure a student’s academic performance inside and outside of class. Once teachers put in the grades, students receive reports showing their grades for each class. From the students perspective, they see the formal feedback on their teacher’s view of their performance in class. By offering grades, educators give students a chance to seek additional help to make academic adjustments for their performance and to help them for their future. When seeking additional help on the students grade, in a way this could help motivate the student to learn more effectively and advocate for themselves. For example, on tests, students will typically put in more time and effort into studying because the results will be graded.
Once a student receives a high grade, they feel positive reinforcement as well a strive to continue on a high academic success. From a teachers perspective, this allows them to create and communicate learning objectives for the class and for the students. Gives them an idea of grading criteria what is provided to the students at the beginning of class as well as learning objectives and expectations for the class. Influences on heavy test grades show the teacher that the results-based of the performance is a motivator of student learning because students must study and perform successfully.
Overall, grades serve as an evaluation of a students work or how well they have achieved the learning objectives or goals established for the course of study.
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. You can order our professional work here.