Only on Eduzaurus

Defining Healthcare as a Privilege, Right Or Responsibility

Download essay
Need help with writing assignment?
writers online
to help you with essay
Download PDF

Over the past decade, increasing healthcare insurance costs have raised politically controversial issues that have pushed their way to the top spot of Congress’ seemingly endless docket. Many scholars and politicians would argue against Barack Obama and McCain that healthcare is a fundamental right and that the government is responsible for making sure the citizens have this right. However, as a capitalist nation, others believe healthcare is a privilege for those that can afford it and not a requirement. “In a presidential debate in October 2008, moderator Tom Brokaw asked, “Is health care in America a privilege, a right, or a responsibility?”” (Ross) The United States healthcare system is set up in a way“not to provide quality health care for all, but to make huge profits for those who own the companies” (HuffPost). Democratic senatorSanders believes that this is wrong and that government needs to correct this. Sanders also thinks there is a corruption in private insurance companies to increase their value in society. As a result, such companies waste hiring additional unnecessary administrative teams by creating multiple diverse programs to maximize the profits and other compensation for the owner. Instead of spending money, the government needs to use these funds on those who can not afford it. Instead of giving it to the prescription company, why we can not spend it on this money public programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and VA. When we analyze this, the middle class does not profit either way. Even in the United States, a capitalist system, we cannot forget our humanity and purpose. For example, there are two people with cancer, chemotherapy with insurance and aperson in poverty that could not pay for coverage. Due to person B’s financial situation is hone diagnosis and the others an automatic death sentence.

Bernie Sanders has good intentions, but he still has many flaws in his plans. Some aspects may not be as throughout for a realistic situation. Everything comes at a price, and although the free programs are enforcing, we must first analyze pending consequences. For instance, who will be providing coverage for all? Will it negatively affect our taxes even more? Will it weaken the economy? What will happen to our high grade, medical field when lowering costs? Such questions need answers before taking such drastic steps.

Essay due? We'll write it for you!

Any subject

Min. 3-hour delivery

Pay if satisfied

Get your price

Not only President Obama was pondering about the future of healthcare, but he also had the opportunity to take action. One drastic step in recent years sought by the government was the implementation of Obamacare in 2012. From 2008-2016, Obama has helped spearhead the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as ObamaCare. “This act provided kids under 26 to stay on their parent’s health insurance and gave patients access to recommended preventive services without cost” (Drierer). In a way, this legislation passed most likely because congresspersons at the time must have believed that the U. S. healthcare system is aright of the citizens.

Kids under 26 allowing kids to stay on their parent’s healthcare while still in their younger adult years show that the government understands that kids cannot currently afford healthcare while in college or hourly job, but still need health care regardless. In a way, the government is trying to help this struggling transitional gap to accept good healthcare without the financial hardship even.

If healthcare is a right of the people, it should be treated the same as the people’s other unalienable rights. In healthcare, it should be equal among all citizens, and no citizen should have more health coverage than other citizens. In the constitution is has stated that the purpose of government is to secure those rights from being taken away. If access to health care is a fundamental right, then the government must be committed to guarantee it to every citizen. Medical treatment would be available to all individual on an equal basis to anyone seeking it, regardless of age, physical condition or even the ability to pay.

In my own experience, I worked in a clinic, where I saw there was a long line of patients waiting in line for the clinic. Due to that low staff, not everyone can get treated by the doctor. From seeing this, it has left me devastated as I felt that patient who did not get checked up would continue to get sick and might get worse. This made me wanted to eager to learn why is the health care system not even focused. As people are devastated about not getting their medicine and have to come to a couple of times again to get one small container, for mental problems they are having for weeks. It made it last this long of how the government doesn’t do anything with the health care system as we have low staffs.

However, Republican Zach Wamp thinks otherwise. In an interview, with an MSNBC news anchor, Mr. Wamp revealed that healthcare is “a privilege” and by allowing universal health care as a right would be “a fast march towards socialism, where the government is bigger than the private sector in our country, and health care’s the next major step. ” (O’Brien). By creating the comparison that free healthcare equality socialism, the audience feels resistant to such changes that would negatively impact our developed country. At the same time, however, wouldn’t are-as a society-then be prohibiting finances over the wellbeing of hundreds. He claims that the current health care system is not entirely taken advantage, and no reform shouldn’t be needed. Of the people uninsured, Wamp explained that half of the employed citizens opt out of their employer’s provided health care. By exposing such percentages, the audience hears that if the current system is taken advantage of there shouldn’tbe any problems with the healthcare system but fail to reflect upon the citizens currently unemployed, disabled.If health care in America is indeed a privilege, what about that those who cannot afford coverage? Are they left to fend for themselves or die to try? Morally it is offensive to us as people, but logically it makes sense to only give health coverage to those who could afford it. Therefore, my question pertains to both logic and ethics, which leaves us as members of society at a sandhill.

Overall, healthcarefall on thepeople and the government, and it is their responsibility to make sure that the system is successful. Healthcare should lean more towards a right than a privilege. Thankfully I am blessed to have healthcare, but I think of those that don’t. We, as a nation, must find a way to take care of one another while maintaining the economy. Do we need a three-story home, a luxury car and brand name clothes to define us, or should we all step back and reflect on our purpose within humanity.

However,they will always be people having more money than others, at times and vice versa. Those who have more money will want to be treated with the best specialists and available treatments. Ultimately this allows those with more money a privilege than those with financial hardships. Unfortunately, regardless of a stance, the health care system will remain a privilege until there is a change in society’s mindset.


This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. You can order our professional work here.

We use cookies to offer you the best experience. By continuing, we’ll assume you agree with our Cookies policy.

Want to get a custom essay from scratch?

Do not miss your deadline waiting for inspiration!

Our writers will handle essay of any difficulty in no time.