Language of Martin Luther King in Beyond Vietnam: a Time to Break Silence


Please note! This essay has been submitted by a student.

Download PDF

 Martin Luther King Jr.’s Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break the Silence was written in 1967 as he wanted to air his views on the after-effects of war which affects the lives and livelihood of all persons and the destruction of properties. The author noted that the family unit had been destroyed and people separated from their loved ones who had little or no power to reconnect. Leaders who had been mandated with the responsibility of setting up structures in place to ensure all citizens live in peace had failed as their ignorance had been one of the catalysts for war. Vietnam had lost a significant amount of time, and it would take a lot of years to rebuild the destruction and loss that had been destroyed. Granting the victims of war an opportunity to enter America and seek asylum services would allow them to rebuild their lives. Additionally, the presence of a religious safe-house in America would give the escaped victims interested in seeking a spiritual authority for inner healing a chance since there are several churches in our country. The collective actions of different bodies in society directly contribute to the stability of the world’s peace status.

Essay due? We'll write it for you!

Any subject

Min. 3-hour delivery

Pay if satisfied

Get your price

The peaceful stability of the world attracts the attention of leaders in different capacities. Vietnam’s instability had attracted the attention of the religious body, The Riverside Church in New York City. The topic of my choice is studying the impact of war on persons and the distractions that result from constant disagreements between citizens who are expected to live in harmony with each other. The speaker argued that the act of ‘no longer being silent would help sensitize the people about the effects of war, thus preventing such an event from taking place in the future .’ The publication is a speech in which Martin Luther King Jr. addresses a congregation of clergymen and other interested persons that sympathized with Vietnam after being held captive by war events. The speech was recorded and is available for the public due to the rich insights from the orator in recognizing that people living in peaceful countries had a moral and ethical responsibility of taking corrective actions towards rehabilitating victims of war. As part of the black community, Martin Luther King Jr. had experienced firsthand effects of discrimination and segregation and understood the impact such had on the esteem of those affected. The orator was also part of a religious group whose objective was to preach against the negative impact of war and offer those that had been affected a haven for reconciliation and healing. The identity is the author is insignificant since the content in his speech is what matters the most.

The author uses simple and direct language to get their message across to their intended audience by highlighting his commitment to playing an active role in helping restore peace. Vietnam had been at war. America had been indirectly supporting the war by sending thousands of its young men to Vietnam. The level of ignorance among most people had been a driving force to engage in war in the country with those living in poor conditions like in the ghettos being affected. Vietnamese citizens had been subjected to war for more than three decades, and the young people had grown without knowing how peace felt. The fact that there had been no actions taken against those that supported or triggered war meant that locals had no choice or avenue to air their grievances. America had ‘failed in its part to liberate the Vietnamese citizens despite the indirect call for help when the people openly proclaimed their independence despite the Japanese and French occupation by using most of the American Declaration of Independence in their freedom document. The author argues that the political instability and suffering of the people in one region of the world was supposed to attract the attention of other countries that had the responsibility of stepping in and initiating sobriety. The author’s choice of words informs the audience that he had a personal conviction and commitment that motivated him to use his influence and position in the religious and social setting to call on other people to see the evil taking place in the country, which would most likely prompt the healing process. The source is descriptive as the author uses a detailed narrative approach that highlights some of the past events while outlining some of the possible solutions for the current status. 

writers online
to help you with essay
banner clock
Clock is ticking and inspiration doesn't come?
We`ll do boring work for you. No plagiarism guarantee. Deadline from 3 hours.

We use cookies to offer you the best experience. By continuing, we’ll assume you agree with our Cookies policy.