The way one dresses has always been a part of judgement of a person throughout human history.
And then there is a tacit social norm of different dress codes for different situations. Plain white and blacks are the colors of mourning all over the world. A person wearing any other color would be frowned in such a setting.
However, apart from the fringe cases, we still observe that layers and quality of clothing increases along the hierarchy of power in an organization. Corporates seem to require dress codes appropriate to the role of the employee. While a lower ranked employee can get away with just some formal shirt and trousers, the manager level employees and higher ups almost always seem to wear business formals as an unspoken rule.
This report evaluates the current trends in perceptions related to clothing in a corporate setup.
Prior to the French Revolution, dress codes were legally enforced in medieval Europe in order to differentiate the various layers of the economic class. Even today, clothing in general is expected to be an indicator of the personality, class and social rung on which a person stands.
Clothing has been a key differentiator in the social standing of various classes throughout history. Medieval Europe even had rules and regulations to prevent the lower classes from buying some specific clothes and fabric.
A soldier’s appearance has always been equated with the degree of his or her professionalism. The uniform is not just a piece of formal clothing to the soldiers, it is their hard-earned badge of distinction and carries a special meaning to them – it may very well end up being their shroud in the face of death.
The uniform speaks to the esprit de corps and resolve inside a unit. Each soldier has an individual obligation regarding guaranteeing that his or her appearance reflects the most elevated amount of demonstrable skill. Individuals in places of power have an obligation regarding executing and applying the measures in this direction to present and promote the best image of the Army, including its conventions and traditions. The regulations require the approval for wear and arrangement of outfits, and the events for wearing all individual (dress pack issue), discretionary, and usually worn authoritative garments and individual gear garbs. It endorses the regalia, honors and emblem approved for wear.
Indian military outfits heavily derive from the former British administrations: olive boring for the armed force, dull blue for the naval force, and sky blue for the aviation based armed forces. More uniform varieties exist in the armed force than in alternate administrations, with certain armed force regiments protecting customary cultural and religious accessories. Sikhs may wear turbans rather than standard military headgear, for instance.
The number one regalia of each regiment is a declaration to the service itself — it reflects India’s unity and strength in diversity — as the troops’ attire mirror in some form or other the local culture of the region. Each contingent about the nature of its locale, its traditions, conventions and culture as found in the style of the military cap, the token worn on the beret or some other part of the uniform.
As rivalry among organizations increases, they employ every single accessible technique to reinforce their position and edge out the competition. One such strategy is to present a desirable corporate image. The positive picture of the organization builds its competitive advantage. It boosts the revenues through an effectively executed corporate image improvement exercise.
The clothes depict a man without needing words. From the manner in which we dress conclusions are drawn about our own qualities, economic wellbeing and professionalism. The worker’s disposition, clothing behavior and corporate culture decide how customers see us.
The dress code is a part of the corporate culture and corporate image of the organization. A principal observed here, is the need to keep up the public image and reputation of the firm. In this unique situation, the dress code is THE best approach to emerge ahead among competitors, express an expert business approach and outright and basic great taste. The second element is the demonstrated capacity of the corporate clothing standard to decidedly affect worker working disposition and core interest. “In the event that individuals come to work in easygoing garments, their state of mind will be easygoing as well, and in our office, it isn’t satisfactory. What we do, regardless ought not be easygoing – we should attempt to be the best in all things, “- says one best executive of an expansive multinational organization.
Another vital ability of the dress code is its capacity to unify workers and cultivate a strong group bond. When the presence of workers is administered by a similar arrangement of regulations, they feel as a part of the whole group and pick up a feeling of proprietorship. This sort of change is essential when a group is attempting to accomplish a shared objective. Numerous organizations’, including extensive multinationals, dress code rules exist either as unwritten principles in the minds of the representatives, or as oral clarifications by the administration about what hues, shapes, outlines and frill employees should wear.
Lamentably, not all employees have the perfect vision about how they should look like in the work environment which makes it a hazard that the presence of such a worker may negatively affect the impression a client has of the organization. Keeping in mind the end goal to avoid such occurrences, it is fundamental for an organization to establish a code, which unambiguously sets out the dress code an employee should adhere to.
Medical Professionals are nowadays associated with white uniforms and lab coats. With regard to patient satisfaction, the evidence suggests that patients do care about how their doctor dresses. Medical literature suggests that patients appear to have a consistent preference for “professional” attire — i.e., roughly business casual, with or without a tie — with a white coat.
That leaves the issue of clinical results, and here we’re perplexed by bunches of theories and few randomized controlled preliminaries. Since the times of Semmelweis, it’s been perceived that doctor cleanliness has implications for transmission of irresistible sicknesses. Scrubs were made exactly for counteractive action towards pathogen transmission in the working theater, yet today they’re worn as much on the tram as in the working room. The Joint Commission needs particular evidence with respect to whether scrubs must be washed every day, making them even more a fashion decision than much else. Furthermore, ties and shirt sleeves may go about as stores for conceivably pathologic specialists. Indeed, in view of this proof, the United Kingdom’s National Health Service has declared a questionable “bare below the elbows” strategy for hospital-based suppliers. At the end of the day, while the confirmation carries very little weight within the medical community, speculations around transmission of irresistible infection have driven medical staff to wear scrubs and short sleeves, lose the ties and wristwatches, and wash our white coats as regularly as possible.
Youngsters’ garments are inflexibly divided, with boy’s garments perpetually fortifying cliché thoughts of manliness, regularly in dull hues, packed with military and sport symbols. By contrast, young girls’ T-shirts are for the most part little cats and butterflies, giving them early, escalated preparing in the feminine part that they’ll be relied upon to adopt as a grown-up. Take a gander at a children’s shoe shop and you’ll see this distinction writ vast, with young men being offered durable, rugged shoes, while young ladies are besieged with footwear more appropriate to princess dress-ups than running and climbing.
Numerous schools continue on with rules about gendered outfits, forcibly driving young ladies into skirts, and young men into ties and pants, notwithstanding research that shows young ladies are less inclined to be practive on the off chance that they’re wearing a skirt.
It has been observed that ladies who wore formal apparel were not evaluated as altogether more equipped than those in the semi-formal condition, however there was an unmistakable qualification between the male gatherings under similar conditions. That is, men were appraised as essentially more capable as the level of formal wear expanded in each condition, with no sort of ceiling effect as was found in the ladies’ case; ladies were just observed as growing in ability up to the semi-formal condition, but not past that. This demonstrates the impact that dress has on perceptions varies extraordinarily amongst people.
Generalizations get hold of the couple of ‘basic, distinctive, essential, effortlessly got a handle on and broadly perceived’ attributes of a man, reduce everything about the individual to those characteristics, overstate and improve them, and fix them without change or advancement to endlessness”. In average Indian discernment, Indian garments influence ladies to appear to be conventional while western garments present them as modern and liberal. Stereotyping “sets up a representative wilderness between the ‘ordinary’ and the ‘degenerate’, the ‘typical’ and the ‘obsessive’, the ‘satisfactory’ and the ‘inadmissible’, what ‘has a place’ and what does not or is ‘Other’, amongst ‘insiders’ and ‘untouchables’.
It is imperative from our discussion that stereotypes exist because of a multiplicity of factors including, but not limited to socio-cultural norms, professions, religion, regions and occasions.
To remove the existing stereotypes, one must incorporate an open culture, while at the same time respecting the need for the differences in clothing according to culture and circumstances. There should be no interference or commenting on what to wear and what not to wear by people, and the same should be incorporated from a very early stage. Young kids and teens must be explained the importance of clothing and the mature mindset one should carry while one dresses up or sees someone else in a particular outfit.
Clothing etiquette and removal of stereotypes should be a part of the educational curriculum from a very early stage and discussion, free flow of ideas and opinions should not be ignored or discouraged.
In an era where clothing becomes a positional good rather than a mere necessity, it is important for every global citizen to be sensitive and open about the ideas associated with it.
When it comes to clothing, it has often been observed that people imitate their favorite celebrities and role models. Hence it becomes imperative for world leaders and famous personalities to sensitize their followers not to discriminate on the basis of apparel and not to get into any inferiority complex.
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. You can order our professional work here.