Please note! This essay has been submitted by a student.
In the Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, The author conveys that morality is something of little importance to many people especially when it comes to obtaining status and wealth. Morality is a reoccurring issue in the Great Gatsby. The characters display many behaviors and actions that are considered to be immoral. The author highlights the absence of morality through three characters: Jay Gatsby, Myrtle Wilson, and Jordan Baker.
Gatsby is a great example of an immoral character. He has committed many crimes such as bootlegging to climb up the social ladder and to also gain wealth. Gatsby throws large and noisy parties at his luxurious house which he can afford because of his illegal business. He is also having an affair with Daisy Buchanan knowing that she is already married to Tom Buchanan, which once again shows how Gatsby disregards moral code. Gatsby is interested in earning more money. Gatsby remembers that Daisy left him because she could not wait for him to gain money. He tries to resolve this issue even if it means that his actions are not morally justified.
Myrtle Wilson is similar to Gatsby because she is participating in an affair with Tom Buchanan. She knows that both she and Tom are married, which again breaks the moral code. Myrtle is different from Gatsby because she desires to have money, whereas Gatsby already has money. Myrtle tries to live the lifestyle of someone rich and high class with Tom. By doing this, she betrays her husband George Wilson. It is apparent that Myrtle values Tom and his money more than she does George Wilson. She believes herself to be too good for Wilson. The way Myrtle prioritizes Tom’s money and tries to act important while having an affair with him highlights her wrongdoings which are morally unjust.
Jordan Baker is a liar and a cheat. In a past golf tournament, she was accused of moving the ball which would have threatened her chances of winning. This scandal, however, was let go of from the press. It is left to assume that Jordan bribed them to keep her status. Whenever Jordan feels that she is at a disadvantage, she lies to still be at an advantage while saving her reputation to the public. Jordan’s actions have more support in self-satisfaction rather than morality.
In the novel, the characters show that morality is not important when it comes to status. They show that it is ok to act immorally since they either have or want money and status. The characters in the story are not involved in moral decision-making. They are figures of privilege, who see themselves as being unbound by standard morals. Fitzgerald used the characters in this novel to represent the theme of moral decay in society.
Although the writer’s thesis statement is adequate and reflects a basic understanding of the text, it nevertheless demonstrates insufficient analytical thinking. A deeper understanding of the text would reflect that the characterization of the actions of the protagonist is more complex than simply describing these as immoral. A stronger thesis statement would have attempted to evaluate the motivations that drive the behaviors of these characteristics in this way, the writer could have more comprehensively incorporated multiple important themes into the essay. For the writer to choose such a strong position as morality it has to be backed up by very strong arguments and evidence from the text which is challenging because there are other stronger themes in the text such as the desperate need to attain social class and status. The paragraphs giving evidence to support the thesis statement are not extensive enough to fully justify the moral position taken by the writer. Specific quotes from the novel should be added which will make arguments stronger. Although there are a few problems in spelling, the writer’s use of grammar, mechanics, and sentence construction is satisfactory. There are no issues in word choice and expression is clear. Organization may be improved by adding headings.