In the year 1607, the first English colony, Jamestown, was established. Nonetheless this was approximately 13 years before the Pilgrims settled in Massachusetts. However, being the first permanent English colony to be established in the Americas, the colonists were not fully equipped with the necessities needed for survival during this time. Which explains why the population had an alarming decrease during the winter; primarily due to the scarcity of food and disease. Not to mention the uneasiness colonists had to face with Powhatan and the Indians, for they were basically claiming their homeland. The founding of Jamestown played a significant role in history because if Jamestown would’ve never been instituted in America, then others wouldn’t have begun to initiate more explorations, and establishments in North America. Nevertheless, without the formulation of the English colony, Jamestown, we wouldn’t have the 50 states in the Untied States.
In the event that colonists had to go through those hardships with settling, in order to implement new and more effective ways to make life in Jamestown sustainable. In December 1606, 105 passengers boarded the Susan Constant, and departed from England in hopes of finding a new place to settle and expand. Unsurprisingly, a good sum of passengers died during the voyage to the Americas. As a matter of fact, the voyage was led by Christopher Newport. Around May 13, 1607, after exactly two weeks of exploring the ships approached the James River where they began the settlement. At the same time, problems began to arise with the Indians whom already claimed the land. Moreover, a colonist by the name of, John Rolfe, introduced tobacco to the people of the colony, and that’s when Jamestown started to become profitable. Fast forward to 1619 where tobacco had become crucial to both the economy and daily lives of the colonists. Their days now consisted of producing and selling tobacco. The usage of tobacco in the colony was extremely beneficial to the economy, causing more jobs to be present, more food, as well as more people begin to migrate to the colony from England/Europe.
Personally, I wouldn’t have done anything extremely differently simply because every hardship the colonists faced needed to occur for change to happen. Without the struggle for survival, they probably wouldn’t have discovered the solutions that were found along the way. With that being said, I would’ve done pretty much the same thing with a few minor changes. To put it differently, without the rain/thunderstorm there wouldn’t be a rainbow; so, it’s perfectly fine to fight through the instability in order to achieve sustainability. As an illustration, it’s fascinating how one exploration led to the founding of what we call the United States of America.
To clarify it may not have explicitly led to the upbringing of all 50 states, but this settlement played an enormous role that’s for sure. It’s important to realize that the founding and establishment of the first permanent English colony, Jamestown, was crucial to the early life in America. It was also the colony where the first representative government had been implemented in British America during 1619. On the positive side, Jamestown later was demolished closer to the mid-1700s, however its legacies are still incorporated in the U.S today. Similarly, both the U.S. and Jamestown possess similar problems for instance present day homelessness, trade disputes, and economic instability. During the years 1754-1763, the French and Indian War/ Seven Years’ War took place.
The French and Indian War was a war between Britain and France including their native allies and colonials; fighting for complete control of all the cities and states east of Mississippi. The Seven Years’ War emerged from constant borderline tensions in the Northern part of America, primarily because both British and French officials sought out to expand each of their influences. Moreover, the main reasons for this war was borderline tensions, trade, and expansion. The French and Indian War affected society by granting Great Britain excessive amounts of territory that Britain didn’t have prior to the war. Its fabricated society because the areas that weren’t under Britain’s authority now must implement their way of life into their own lifestyles. Not to mention, this led to Britain being in great debts, due to all the war expenses that needed to be paid for. In the end, it led to uneasiness within the colonies and left a big dent in Britain’s economy. Another key point is the important people involved within the war, for example, George Washington and Robert Rogers whom were both Commanders for the American militia. In short, both men helped lead the American militia during the war. Their sole motive was to ensure that the militias were prepared and equipped with the necessary supplies and skill to win battles and in time win the war. That is to say that, if I were to do anything differently it would be strengthen and solidify the militia. As well as, formulate more strategic battle plans to effectively beat the French in all battles.
Other than that, I may have increased taxes or requested a loan from an ally to help aid with the war expenses/debt. Ultimately, Britain did successfully win the war, so they must’ve done something right. In essence, it’s captivating to know that this war lasted seven whole years, which is completely insane that one could fight and battle for such a large amount of time. Generally speaking, World War l did last about four years, and World War ll lasted about six years; so, it was a semi common thing for wars to last a few years. In today’s society war is viewed completely different than in this time period because now warfare has advanced severely, armies are ten times more dangerous than they were in 1754-1763. As an illustration, if a war was to occur in present time the whole population could possibly be wiped out because of the severity of weapons and warfare that has been developed over the years. Moreover, the Seven Years’ War helped shape the world and the way we interpret war, overall.
The Louisiana Purchase was the procurement of province of Louisiana by the U.S. from the French in 1803. To be exact, the Louisiana Purchase brought 828,000 square miles of territory from France to the United States. In fact, the Louisiana Purchase doubled the size of the U.S. in the early 1800s. To illustrate, the Louisiana territory elongated from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from the Gulf of Mexico to the Canadian Border, which is a pretty massive territorial expansion. Although, this was a big investment to purchase this land it did not affect the economy as bad as you may think. In 1796, France and Spain became allies, causing Britain to utilize its strong army to ruin Spain’s alliance with America. Later in the road around 1801, Spain signed a treaty which basically restored the Louisiana Territory back to France.
Henceforth, this led to uneasiness within the U.S. because the Mississippi River was on the line. As a result, President Thomas Jefferson sent a letter to France minister Robert Livingston regarding the issue. Consequently, minister Livingston was ordered to negotiate with his people about the United States purchasing New Orleans. With not much success with his letter Thomas Jefferson then aided upcoming U.S. President James Monroe to Paris to further help Livingston discuss the purchase.
Surprisingly, in April 1803 not too long before President Monroe’s arrival France offered all of Louisiana to Livingston. In the long run, Napoleon then offered the U.S. to buy the entire Louisiana Territory. In this particular situation, I wouldn’t have done anything differently for the reason that in the end the United States still was able to purchase all of the Louisiana Territory. Similarly, I would’ve sent people to help negotiate the same way Thomas Jefferson proceeded to because in the end that really helped with the overall purchase. As has been noted, the U.S. thought to purchase all of Louisiana when Spain granted the French the Louisiana Territory in a private treaty. Even today we still face many borderline tensions throughout the U.S. however we’re not investing in any more land like in the 1800s.
The Great Hunger, also referred to as The Irish Potato Famine, lasted from 1845-1852. The Great Hunger begun in 1845 due to a fungi organism by the name of Phytophthora infectants which started to disseminate expeditiously throughout Ireland. Moreover, this infestation targeted the potato crops, which later on ruined half of the crops in about one year. Not to mention, approximately 75% of the potato crops were damaged gradually within the span of seven years. In short, majority of the farmers in Ireland relied strongly on potato as their primary food source. Consequently, not only did the fungi infestation cause a decrease in potato production it also put a dent in the population due to the scarcity of food. Ultimately, millions of Irish people died because of starvation. Prime Minister Lord John Russell was appointed Prime Minister in 1846 and formulated a government that took little involvement in aiding Ireland during this crisis. In the final analysis, it can be said that the British felt superior to the Irish, one could even note that they might’ve even looked down upon them or viewed them as less than human.
Given these points his motive was simply to “teach” the Irish to learn not to depend on the government so heavily and figure things out on their own. Later, the government began to overwork the Irish workers and they were slowly weakening due to malnutrition and the lack of food. Personally, if I were a British government official, I would have taken a whole different approach to this issue. For Instance, providing different sources of food to the Irish, and finding possible new areas of land that weren’t being used to begin planting more potatoes. Nothing that took place is something that I’ll take part in. However, it’s important to note both how crucial potatoes were to Ireland as a whole during this time and the way the British Government approached this crisis in the most spiteful way possible. Conversely, in current history the government takes a little more logical approach to many issues rather than completely ignore the issue because of one’s ethnicity or nationality. Similarly, both governments are semi-racists.
12 years a Slave (2013), is a biography film/memoir of an African American slave by the name of Solomon Northup, whom was born a free man in New York, where slaves were labeled as free/non-slaves. As a free man in New York Solomon worked as a violinist, whom lived happily with his wife and children. In reality, Solomon had three children despite in the film where him and his wife had two children. However, Solomon’s life took a turn in 1841 when he was kidnapped by two con artists in Washington, D.C. and sold into slavery. Similarly, to the movie Solomon was indeed manipulated and sold into slavery in 1841 and didn’t redeem his freedom until the late 1800s.
Above all, the actor that played Solomon looked similar to him in appearance. On the contrary, specific parts in the film are completely fictional and were implemented by the director to add some spice to the movie. To enumerate, the scene that involves Solomon being intimate with a woman was something added in to symbolize a Marvin Gaye quote. It’s important to realize that Solomon did make it known to the slave master the two men brought him to, that he was a free man; without a care the man beat him for he didn’t care that he was a free man and he’s later labeled as an escaped slave from Georgia. Whilst, on the ship to the South Solomon and two other slaves, Arthur and Robert, planned to take over the ship that planned altered when Robert later died from smallpox, not from getting stabbed as the film displays. Correspondingly to the film, Solomon did in fact get his name changed from Solomon Northup to Platt Hamilton. Solomon’s slave owner, Edwin Epps, was truly as atrocious as the actor portrayed him as in the movie. It has been said that he was much more brutal than what is depicted in the movie. Nevertheless, in the film Patsey proceeds to beg Solomon to end her life, which happens to be untrue this scene was utilized to appeal to the audience’s emotions and implement an unexpected turn in the movie. In the final analysis, the film, 12 years a Slave (2013), was indeed historically accurate portraying a beautiful representation of Solomon’s life.
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. You can order our professional work here.